by Sara McGinnis posted in Parenting

Anyone who's ever set eyes upon a newborn knows that, while they're sweet, precious things, infancy is generally not the most photo-ready age. Hours of being squished through the birth canal, a good bout with infant acne, and not yet having learned how to avoid scratching your face with your own fingernails can leave some tiny babies looking less than angelic.
But is it okay to use a camera filter on a newborn to hide their "blemishes" or add some fun" Is it ridiculous to not be able to accept an infant as wonderful, "imperfections" and all"
It's a debate Khloe Kardashian recently became embroiled in after posting the first public shot of her 1-month-old daughter. Click here to check out the short video of True Thompson.
I'll be the first to admit Snapchat, filters, and the related whatnot aren't my area of expertise, but what I gather is the filter Khloe used not only added a flower to her daughter's head, but made it appear as though True has freckles.
Opting for the face palm emoji one person tweeted "we?re gonna have a generation that judge babies for being ugly if they don?t look like Insta filters."
Another pair of comments I saw on a Facebook post about Khloe Kardashian's baby pic read:
"Already with the filters" Smh."
"I thought the same thing. Plastic surgery by preschool."
That's pretty harsh, but I can see their point about altering a baby's looks. It's sendin...